Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julian Lenz vs Max Purcell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lenz vs Purcell analysis and find out who is favored!
Julian Lenz vs Max Purcell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lenz 1 - 0 Purcell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lenz has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Purcell has won 52.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lenz, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Purcell has won 45.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 26.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lenz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Purcell has saved 61.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lenz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Purcell winning 42.11% (W/L 24/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lenz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 121/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Purcell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 205/ 142), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lenz winning 1 times and Purcell being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lenz winning 2 and Purcell winning 0. The last match between Lenz and Purcell was at the Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch, 04-06-2022, Q1 round, Grass with Julian Lenz getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:3.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lenz and Purcell have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lenz winning 0 times and Purcell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lenz winning 0, and Purcell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lenz has played against opponents with an average rank of while Purcell has played against players with an average rank of 189.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lenz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Purcell has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lenz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Purcell has converted 33.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
864
Rank
227
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
100
Rank
40
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
55% (207-169)
Career Total W/L
57% (277-207)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
41% (11-16)
$25,665
Career Prize Money
$936,175
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Julian Lenz vs Max Purcell For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Lenz VS Purcell
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Julian Lenz | Max Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:3 | 1:12:3 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (33/56) | 63% (41/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (24/33) | 66% (27/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (15/23) | 42% (10/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (28/65) | 30% (17/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Julian Lenz
Player
Max Purcell
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julian Lenz | Max Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 41% (11/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 41% (29/42) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (321/368) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 35% (6/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.61 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 206 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 65 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:49:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 208.11 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (1232/2141) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 72% (886/1232) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (479/909) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (50/151) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (700/2100) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (6/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (10/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 22% (18/4) |
Julian Lenz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Robin Haase
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
111)
11
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
79)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
41 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-2 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Dennis Novak
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
11
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
33 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Hazem Naow
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Mikalai Haliak
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
19
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Aldin Setkic
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
14
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Andrew Paulson
58%
(
69 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
12
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
48 of
62)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
36 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Julian Lenz
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
28%
(
10 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Julian Lenz
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Max Purcell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
17
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Max Purcell
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
11
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Max Purcell
64%
(
96 of
149)
1st Serve %
52%
(
82 of
157)
10
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
53 of
82)
57%
(
30 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
34%
(
51 of
149)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
62 of
157)
160
Total Points Won
146
|
6-2 6-2 3-6 4-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Max Purcell
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Remy Bertola
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
70 of
106)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Fajing Sun
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Max Purcell
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lenz Vs Purcell Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Lenz are available here and Purcell photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
